AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows no direct signs of malicious intent, but its metadata and potential for shell exploitation raise concerns. Further scrutiny is advised.
- High metadata risk due to recent creation and lack of maintainer information.
- Potential shell risk from subprocess calls.
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal and not indicative of malicious activity.
- Shell: Subprocess call to an editor might be legitimate for editing purposes, but could potentially be exploited. Further investigation into the context of use is recommended.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious credential theft.
- Metadata: The package is highly suspicious due to its recent creation and lack of maintainer information.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
score 2.0
Found 1 shell execution pattern(s)
curses.endwin() subprocess.call([editor, tmp]) except OSError: return No
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: live.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 5.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T01:28:30Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T01:28:30Z)All 13 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T05:44:48.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)