AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows minimal risk in terms of network calls, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential handling. However, its metadata suggests it is newly created with no maintainer history, raising concerns about potential supply-chain attacks.
- Metadata risk due to new package creation without maintainer history
- Minimal risks in other categories
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal for a package that doesn't require external API access.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of executing system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package shows signs of being newly created and lacks maintainer history, which raises suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 3.0
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T05:27:11.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)