AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network, shell, and obfuscation activities, but the metadata risk is high due to lack of author details and a single-package maintainer, indicating potential suspicious activity.
- Metadata risk score of 7 out of 10
- No author name or GitHub link provided
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating safe handling of secrets and credentials.
- Metadata: The package is new, lacks an author's name and GitHub link, and the maintainer has only one package, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T07:59:47.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)