🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package exhibits low risk in terms of network usage, shell execution, and obfuscation but has a relatively high metadata risk due to its new creation with limited information from the author.

Low network and shell risk
High metadata risk due to new package creation with sparse details

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require external communications.
Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package likely does not execute system commands.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent related to code obfuscation.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting no immediate risk of secret or sensitive information being stolen.
Metadata: The package shows signs of being newly created with minimal information provided by the author, raising suspicion.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

Email domain looks legitimate: users.noreply.github.com>

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

✓ Git Repository History

No GitHub repository linked

No GitHub repository link found

⚠ Maintainer History score 10.0

5 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T06:26:50.000Z)
Author name is missing or very short
Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)