AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package exhibits low risk in terms of network usage, shell execution, and obfuscation but has a relatively high metadata risk due to its new creation with limited information from the author.
- Low network and shell risk
- High metadata risk due to new package creation with sparse details
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require external communications.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package likely does not execute system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent related to code obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting no immediate risk of secret or sensitive information being stolen.
- Metadata: The package shows signs of being newly created with minimal information provided by the author, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: users.noreply.github.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 10.0
5 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T06:26:50.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue