🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package shows low technical risks but raises concerns due to its metadata, suggesting potential low activity or recent creation which could indicate a supply-chain attack.

Metadata risk is high
Recently created with low activity

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of executing system commands.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting safe handling of secrets and credentials.
Metadata: Highly suspicious due to recent creation, low activity, and minimal metadata effort.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

⚠ Git Repository History score 10.0

Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 5 day(s) ago (2026-05-31T08:39:56Z)

Repository created very recently: 5 day(s) ago (2026-05-31T08:39:56Z)
Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Single contributor with only 3 commit(s) — possibly throwaway account
All 3 commits happened within 24 hours

⚠ Maintainer History score 8.0

4 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T02:38:20.000Z)
Author "Shawn Knight" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)