AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package exhibits low risk in terms of network activity, shell execution, and obfuscation. However, the metadata suggests potential issues with maintenance effort, raising suspicion about its authenticity and safety.
- Low effort in metadata
- Possibly new or inactive maintainer
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require internet access.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution by the package.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package shows signs of low effort and possibly new or inactive maintainer which raises suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
No author email provided
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T02:22:52.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)