🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package has a low risk profile in terms of network, shell, obfuscation, and credential risks. However, the metadata risk score is high due to recent creation, a single contributor, and sparse activity, which raises suspicion.

High metadata risk score
Recently created with sparse activity

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution risk.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Metadata: High risk due to recent creation, single contributor, and sparse activity.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

Email domain looks legitimate: thalam.ai>

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

⚠ Git Repository History score 10.0

Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T03:58:48Z)

Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T03:58:48Z)
Repository appears empty (size = 0)
Very few commits: 1 total
Single contributor with only 1 commit(s) — possibly throwaway account

⚠ Maintainer History score 8.0

4 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T03:54:20.000Z)
Author name is missing or very short
Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)