AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risk in terms of network usage, shell execution, and obfuscation but has a high metadata risk due to lack of maintainer history and author details, indicating potential malicious intent.
- High metadata risk
- No maintainer history or author details
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of malicious activity.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, suggesting legitimate code without attempts to hide functionality.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating safe handling of sensitive information.
- Metadata: The package is newly uploaded with no maintainer history and lacks an author's name, raising suspicion of potential malicious intent.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:01:05.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)