AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risk in terms of network activity, shell execution, and obfuscation. However, the lack of metadata such as an author's name and an associated GitHub repository raises concerns about its legitimacy.
- Lack of author information
- No associated GitHub repository
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is not necessarily suspicious but depends on the intended functionality of the package.
- Shell: No shell execution detected, which aligns with the expectation for a benign package unless it's supposed to execute commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is new, lacks an author's name, and has no associated GitHub repository, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:09:28.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)