AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package dialectica v0.3.1 exhibits low operational risks but has notable metadata issues such as missing author information and a lack of PyPI classifiers, suggesting potential unreliability or malicious intent.
- Recent upload with missing author details
- Lack of PyPI classifiers
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires internet access for its functionality.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution from the package.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package shows several red flags including recent upload, missing author details, and lack of PyPI classifiers.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:24:56.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue