🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package shows low risks in terms of network activity, shell execution, and obfuscation. However, it has high metadata risk due to being newly published with limited maintainer history and no author details.

Low risk in network, shell, and obfuscation activities.
High metadata risk due to lack of maintainer history and author details.

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls suggest the package is not attempting to communicate externally, which is expected for most benign packages.
Shell: No shell executions indicate the package does not execute external commands, reducing risk of malicious behavior.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Metadata: The package is brand new with limited maintainer history and no author details, raising concerns about its legitimacy.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

⚠ Git Repository History score 3.0

GitHub API error: 403

GitHub API error: 403

⚠ Maintainer History score 8.0

4 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T06:38:30.000Z)
Author name is missing or very short
Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)