AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows low risks in terms of network, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, its metadata risk score is high due to the package being newly published with limited maintainer history and incomplete author information, which raises suspicion.
- Metadata risk due to new package and limited maintainer history
- Incomplete author information
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires internet access to function.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution from the package.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is brand new with limited maintainer history and incomplete author information, raising suspicion.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 3.0
GitHub API error: 403
GitHub API error: 403
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:29:21.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)