braintoken-downloader

v0.1.0 suspicious
6.0
Medium Risk

Add your description here

🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package has legitimate-looking functionality but shows signs of low effort and a newly created account, raising concerns about its authenticity and potential malicious intent.

  • Metadata risk indicating low effort and new account creation
  • Legitimate network calls for authentication and dataset authorization
Per-check LLM notes
  • Network: The network calls appear to be related to authentication and dataset authorization, which could be legitimate for a downloader package.
  • Shell: No shell execution patterns were detected.
  • Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
  • Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
  • Metadata: The package shows signs of low effort and a newly created account, which raises suspicion.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

Outbound Network Calls score 6.0

Found 4 network call pattern(s)

  • " try: response = requests.get( f"{API_BASE}/auth/dataset/authorize",
  • ownloader import requests requests.get(url) requests.post(url, json=data) """ import socket fro
  • sts requests.get(url) requests.post(url, json=data) """ import socket from typing import Any im
  • } response = requests.post( login_api, json={"accessKey": ak, "
Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

Registered Email Domain

Email domain looks legitimate: baai.ac.cn>

Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

Git Repository History

No GitHub repository linked

  • No GitHub repository link found
Maintainer History score 8.0

4 maintainer concern(s) found

  • Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
  • Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:24:55.000Z)
  • Author "史红光" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
  • Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)