AI Analysis
The package shows no immediate signs of network or shell risks, but the metadata risk score due to the maintainer's account status suggests potential issues with the package's provenance.
- Maintainer has a new or inactive account
- Lack of proper author name
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require internet access.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating the package does not execute external commands.
- Metadata: The maintainer has a new or inactive account and lacks a proper author name, which raises some suspicion but not enough to conclusively indicate malicious intent.
Package Quality Overall: Low (3.8/10)
No test suite detected
No test files or test-runner configuration detected
Some documentation present
Brief PyPI description (288 chars)
No contributing guide or governance files found
Development Status classifier >= Beta
No type annotations detected
No type annotations, py.typed marker, or stub files detected
Active multi-contributor project
4 unique contributor(s) across 75 commits in CoreOxide/aws_resource_validatorSmall but multi-author team (3–4 contributors)
Heuristic Checks
No suspicious network call patterns found
No obfuscation patterns detected
No shell execution patterns detected
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
All external links appear legitimate
Repository CoreOxide/aws_resource_validator appears legitimate
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Build a simple Python application using the aws-resource-validator-odb package to demonstrate its core features.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue