AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package Astrum v0.1.0 has low technical risks but exhibits metadata red flags such as a newly created repository and limited maintainer history.
- Newly created repository
- Single contributor with few commits
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution detected, indicating no direct system command execution by the package.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package shows several red flags including a newly created repository, single contributor with few commits, and a lack of maintainer history.
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
No suspicious network call patterns found
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
score 10.0
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T08:48:01Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T08:48:01Z)Repository appears empty (size = 0)Single contributor with only 3 commit(s) — possibly throwaway accountAll 3 commits happened within 24 hours
Maintainer History
score 8.0
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T09:19:18.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)