AI Analysis
The package shows low individual risks in terms of network, shell, obfuscation, and credential handling. However, the lack of a Git repository and maintainer inactivity raise concerns about its legitimacy and could indicate potential supply-chain issues.
- No direct network, shell, obfuscation, or credential risks detected.
- Suspicious metadata due to missing Git repository and inactive maintainer.
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate risk of command injection or unauthorized system access.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package is suspicious due to the non-existent Git repository and the maintainer's inactivity.
Package Quality Overall: Low (2.4/10)
No test suite detected
No test files or test-runner configuration detected
Some documentation present
Detailed PyPI description (8047 chars)
No contributing guide or governance files found
Development Status classifier >= Beta
No type annotations detected
No type annotations, py.typed marker, or stub files detected
Could not retrieve contributor data from GitHub
GitHub API error: 404
Heuristic Checks
No suspicious network call patterns found
No obfuscation patterns detected
No shell execution patterns detected
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
No author email provided
All external links appear legitimate
Repository not found (deleted or private)
Repository not found (deleted or private)
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packageAuthor "Nitesh Kumar" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Create a fully-functional mini-app called 'AutoGrader' that leverages the 'assignment-evaluator' package to automate the grading process of student assignments submitted as PDFs. The app should include the following functionalities: 1. **User Authentication**: Implement a simple login system where teachers can create accounts to access their grading dashboard. 2. **Assignment Upload**: Allow teachers to upload assignment documents (PDF format) which will serve as the basis for grading. 3. **Student Submission Handling**: Students can submit their completed assignments via the app, ensuring these submissions are also in PDF format. 4. **Automatic Rubric Generation**: Utilize the 'assignment-evaluator' package to automatically generate grading rubrics based on the uploaded assignment document. 5. **Automated Grading**: Automatically grade each student submission against the generated rubric using the AI capabilities provided by the 'assignment-evaluator' package. 6. **Feedback Generation**: Generate detailed feedback for each submission, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement. 7. **Grading Dashboard**: Teachers should have access to a dashboard displaying all submissions, grades, and feedback. They should also be able to manually adjust grades if necessary. 8. **Notifications**: Send automated notifications to students once their grades and feedback are available. 9. **Data Privacy Compliance**: Ensure all data handling complies with GDPR or other relevant data protection regulations. Use Flask or Django for backend development, React or Angular for frontend, and PostgreSQL for database management. Integrate the 'assignment-evaluator' package effectively to ensure seamless grading and feedback generation processes.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue