AI Analysis
Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS
The package shows signs of legitimate functionality but raises concerns due to incomplete metadata and a potentially new or inactive maintainer.
- Metadata risk due to missing maintainer information
- Suspicion regarding the maintainer's account activity
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The network calls suggest legitimate data sending behavior, possibly for logging or analytics purposes.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The maintainer's author name is missing and the account seems new or inactive, raising some suspicion.
Package Quality Overall: Low (4.0/10)
○ Low
Test Suite
1.0
No test suite detected
No test files or test-runner configuration detected
◈ Medium
Documentation
7.0
Some documentation present
Documentation URL: "Documentation" -> https://apilens.aiDetailed PyPI description (6411 chars)
○ Low
Contributing Guide
2.0
No contributing guide or governance files found
No CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, or governance files found
◈ Medium
Type Annotations
5.0
Partial type annotation coverage
37 type-annotated function signatures detected in source
◈ Medium
Multiple Contributors
5.0
Limited contributor diversity
1 unique contributor(s) across 100 commits in apilens/apilensSingle author but highly active (100 commits)
Heuristic Checks
Outbound Network Calls
score 3.0
Found 2 network call pattern(s)
/"), ) req = urllib.request.Request( ingest_url, method="POST",oqa: SLF001 with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=self.config.timeout, context=ssl_contex
Code Obfuscation
No obfuscation patterns detected
Shell / Subprocess Execution
No shell execution patterns detected
Credential Harvesting
No credential harvesting patterns detected
Typosquatting
No typosquatting candidates detected
Registered Email Domain
Email domain looks legitimate: apilens.ai>
Suspicious Page Links
All external links appear legitimate
Git Repository History
Repository apilens/apilens appears legitimate
Maintainer History
score 4.0
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Use this prompt to build a project with apilenss
Build a simple Python application using the apilenss package to demonstrate its core features.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue