AI Analysis
The package shows low individual risks across network, shell, and obfuscation activities but has a high metadata risk due to its newly created repository and minimal activity, raising suspicion about potential supply-chain attack vectors.
- High metadata risk due to new and minimally active repository
- Low individual risks in network, shell, and obfuscation activities
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires network interaction for its functionality.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious activity involving system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious activity.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting no immediate risk related to secret theft.
- Metadata: The repository and package show signs of being newly created with minimal activity, indicating potential risk.
Heuristic Checks
No suspicious network call patterns found
No obfuscation patterns detected
No shell execution patterns detected
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
All external links appear legitimate
Git history flags: Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T03:45:14Z)
Repository created very recently: 0 day(s) ago (2026-06-05T03:45:14Z)Repository appears empty (size = 0)Very few commits: 2 totalSingle contributor with only 2 commit(s) — possibly throwaway account
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packagePackage uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T04:20:28.000Z)Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue