apache-airflow-providers-neo4j

v3.11.5 safe
3.0
Low Risk

Provider package apache-airflow-providers-neo4j for Apache Airflow

🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SAFE

The package shows low risks across all assessed categories, with only minor metadata concerns. It is considered safe with no indications of a supply-chain attack.

  • Low network and shell execution risks.
  • Minor metadata issues but no signs of malicious intent.
Per-check LLM notes
  • Network: No network calls detected, which is normal if the package does not require external communication.
  • Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate risk of command execution.
  • Obfuscation: The observed pattern is likely a standard method for extending module search paths and not indicative of malicious activity.
  • Credentials: No patterns indicative of credential harvesting were found.
  • Metadata: The package has some minor issues with maintainer history and an insecure link, but no clear signs of malice.

📦 Package Quality Overall: Medium (7.8/10)

✦ High Test Suite 9.0

Test suite present — 14 test file(s) found

  • Test runner config found: conftest.py
  • 14 test file(s) detected (e.g. conftest.py)
✦ High Documentation 9.0

Well-documented package

  • Documentation URL: "Documentation" -> https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-neo
  • 1 documentation file(s) (e.g. conf.py)
  • Detailed PyPI description (3469 chars)
○ Low Contributing Guide 4.0

No contributing guide or governance files found

  • Development Status classifier >= Beta
◈ Medium Type Annotations 7.0

Partial type annotation coverage

  • Type checker (mypy / pyright / pytype) referenced in project
  • 9 type-annotated function signatures (partial)
✦ High Multiple Contributors 10.0

Active multi-contributor project

  • 46 unique contributor(s) across 100 commits in apache/airflow
  • Active community — 5 or more distinct contributors

🔬 Heuristic Checks

Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

Code Obfuscation score 4.0

Found 2 obfuscation pattern(s)

  • under the License. __path__ = __import__("pkgutil").extend_path(__path__, __name__) # Licensed to the Apache S
  • under the License. __path__ = __import__("pkgutil").extend_path(__path__, __name__) # # Licensed to the Apache
Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

Registered Email Domain

Email domain looks legitimate: airflow.apache.org>

Suspicious Page Links score 2.0

Found 1 suspicious link(s) on the package page

  • Non-HTTPS external link: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Git Repository History

Repository apache/airflow appears legitimate

Maintainer History score 4.0

2 maintainer concern(s) found

  • Author name is missing or very short
  • Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.

💡 AI App Starter Prompt

Use this prompt to build a project with apache-airflow-providers-neo4j
Build a simple Python application using the apache-airflow-providers-neo4j package to demonstrate its core features.

💬 Discussion Feed

Leave a comment

No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!