AI Analysis
The package exhibits significant risks related to shell and obfuscation usage, which could lead to severe vulnerabilities like command injection and remote code execution. While not definitive proof of malicious intent, these factors combined with credential and metadata risks warrant caution.
- High shell risk due to os.system() and subprocess with shell=True
- Severe obfuscation risk due to eval() with user-controlled data
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: The network call pattern suggests the package may be communicating with an external service, which could be legitimate but requires further investigation into its purpose.
- Shell: The use of os.system() and subprocess with shell=True indicates potential for command injection vulnerabilities, suggesting a higher risk that needs addressing to prevent possible exploitation.
- Obfuscation: The presence of 'eval()' with user-controlled data suggests potential for malicious obfuscation and remote code execution.
- Credentials: Reading sensitive files such as /etc/passwd, .env, and private keys indicates a high risk of credential harvesting.
- Metadata: The maintainer has a new or inactive account and lacks a proper author name, raising some suspicion.
Package Quality Overall: Low (4.2/10)
No test suite detected
No test files or test-runner configuration detected
Some documentation present
Detailed PyPI description (6961 chars)
No contributing guide or governance files found
Development Status classifier >= Beta
Partial type annotation coverage
113 type-annotated function signatures detected in source
Limited contributor diversity
2 unique contributor(s) across 9 commits in Threads-Beams/ALNURTwo distinct contributors found
Heuristic Checks
Found 1 network call pattern(s)
try: resp = requests.post( _OSV_BATCH_URL, json=payloa
Found 4 obfuscation pattern(s)
s|body|query|argv)", "eval() called with user-controlled data — remote code execution r"Never pass user input to eval(). Use safe alternatives like ast.literal_eval()", (COOKIE|SERVER)", "PHP eval() with user input — direct remote code execution", "e execution", "Remove eval() with user input entirely; redesign the logic", ("*
Found 4 shell execution pattern(s)
"Possible command injection: os.system() with user-controlled input", # alnur: ignore "Usea list of arguments and avoid shell=True", ("*.py",), "CWE-78", ), _rule( "I"subprocess called with shell=True — enables shell injection", "Pass command as a listcommand as a list and remove shell=True unless absolutely required", ("*.py",), "CWE-78",
Found 1 credential access pattern(s)
y", _PY, "Agent reads /etc/passwd, .env, private keys, or other sensitive files", ),
No typosquatting candidates detected
Email domain looks legitimate: threadsandbeams.com>
Found 1 suspicious link(s) on the package page
Non-HTTPS external link: http://...
Repository Threads-Beams/ALNUR appears legitimate
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Create a mini-application called 'VulnerabilityScanner' using Python that leverages the 'alnur' package to identify potential security vulnerabilities in web applications. This tool should allow users to input URLs of websites they want to scan for common vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and open redirect attacks. Additionally, the application should generate a report detailing the vulnerabilities found along with severity levels and recommended actions to mitigate these risks. Steps to develop the application: 1. Set up the environment with Python and install necessary packages including 'alnur'. 2. Design a user-friendly command-line interface where users can enter URLs and select the type of scan they wish to perform. 3. Implement functionality within 'VulnerabilityScanner' that uses 'alnur' to analyze the provided URL and detect any known vulnerabilities. 4. Create a feature to categorize detected vulnerabilities based on their severity (low, medium, high). 5. Develop a reporting system that compiles findings into a human-readable format, outlining each issue, its severity, and suggestions for remediation. 6. Ensure the application includes error handling for invalid inputs and network issues. 7. Test the application thoroughly against various test cases to ensure accuracy and reliability. 8. Document the code and provide usage instructions for other developers or security professionals.
💬 Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue