AI Analysis
The package has minimal risks in terms of network, shell execution, and obfuscation. However, its newness and lack of an active GitHub repository make it suspicious, especially considering potential supply-chain attacks.
- Metadata risk due to limited package activity
- No active GitHub repository linked
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package is expected to communicate with external services.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution by the package.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious intent.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, suggesting safe handling of secrets and credentials.
- Metadata: The package appears to be newly created with limited activity and no associated GitHub repository, raising some suspicion but not definitive evidence of malice.
Package Quality Overall: Low (2.8/10)
No test suite detected
No test files or test-runner configuration detected
Some documentation present
Detailed PyPI description (4694 chars)
No contributing guide or governance files found
No CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, or governance files found
Partial type annotation coverage
299 type-annotated function signatures detected in source
Unable to verify contributor count: no GitHub repository found
No GitHub repository linked β contributor count unavailable
Heuristic Checks
No suspicious network call patterns found
No obfuscation patterns detected
No shell execution patterns detected
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
No author email provided
All external links appear legitimate
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released β brand new packageAuthor "Rui Zhang" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Create a mini-application named 'AlgorithmExplorer' that leverages the 'algodisco' package to discover and evaluate algorithms for specific problems. The application should allow users to input a problem description and receive a list of potential algorithms along with their pros and cons. Hereβs how the application will work step-by-step: 1. **Problem Input**: Users provide a brief problem statement or question related to algorithmic challenges. 2. **Algorithm Discovery**: Using 'algodisco', the application searches for relevant algorithms based on the user's input. It should consider various aspects like time complexity, space complexity, and applicability to the problem. 3. **Algorithm Evaluation**: For each discovered algorithm, the application generates a brief summary including a description, time/space complexity analysis, and any notable strengths or weaknesses. 4. **User Feedback Loop**: After presenting the results, the application allows users to select an algorithm for further exploration or refinement of the search criteria. 5. **Integration with External Data**: Optionally, the application can integrate with external data sources (like repositories of code examples or academic papers) to provide more comprehensive information about the selected algorithms. 6. **Visualization of Results**: Implement basic visualization tools (e.g., charts showing performance metrics) to help users better understand the differences between algorithms. 7. **Documentation and Support**: Provide a simple guide within the application that explains how to use the tool effectively and links to further resources for learning about algorithms. The 'algodisco' package will be central to the algorithm discovery phase, where its ability to drive the search through language models will be crucial. Additionally, explore how to enhance user interaction and make the evaluation process as intuitive and informative as possible.
π¬ Discussion Feed
No discussion yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Report Abuse / Security Issue