AI Analysis
The package shows minimal risk indicators with no network calls, shell executions, or obfuscations detected. The metadata risk is slightly elevated due to the maintainer's single package history, but there are no other suspicious activities.
- No network calls detected
- Maintainer has only one package
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external resources.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate signs of executing system commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk of malicious obfuscation.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk of secret or credential theft.
- Metadata: The maintainer has only one package, which might indicate a new or less active account, but no other suspicious activities are detected.
Package Quality Overall: Low (3.4/10)
Partial test coverage signals detected
2 test file(s) detected (e.g. __init__.py)
Some documentation present
1 documentation file(s) (e.g. conf.py)Detailed PyPI description (7682 chars)
No contributing guide or governance files found
No CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, or governance files found
No type annotations detected
No type annotations, py.typed marker, or stub files detected
Unable to verify contributor count: no GitHub repository found
No GitHub repository linked — contributor count unavailable
Heuristic Checks
No suspicious network call patterns found
No obfuscation patterns detected
No shell execution patterns detected
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
Email domain looks legitimate: alleninstitute.org>
All external links appear legitimate
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
1 maintainer concern(s) found
Author "Allen Institute for Neural Dynamics" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Create a mini-application that simulates and analyzes the foraging behavior of a population over time using the 'aind-dynamic-foraging-population-analysis' package. This application will allow users to input parameters such as initial population size, food availability, and environmental factors to observe how these variables affect the population's foraging efficiency and survival rates. Steps: 1. Begin by installing the 'aind-dynamic-foraging-population-analysis' package if it isn't already installed. 2. Design a user-friendly interface where users can input various parameters including initial population size, food distribution patterns, and environmental challenges like weather conditions or predation risks. 3. Implement a simulation engine using functions from the 'aind-dynamic-foraging-population-analysis' package to model the population's foraging behavior based on the provided inputs. 4. Integrate analytical tools from the package to calculate metrics such as average foraging success rate, population growth rate, and energy expenditure. 5. Visualize the simulation results through graphs and charts showing trends over time, such as population changes, food consumption, and foraging efficiency. 6. Allow users to run multiple simulations with different parameter sets to explore 'what-if' scenarios and understand the impact of varying environmental factors. 7. Include documentation and comments within your code to explain how each part of the application works, especially how it leverages the 'aind-dynamic-foraging-population-analysis' package. Features: - User Input Interface: Allows customization of simulation parameters. - Simulation Engine: Uses 'aind-dynamic-foraging-population-analysis' to simulate population dynamics. - Analytical Tools: Provides metrics for evaluating foraging efficiency and population health. - Visualization: Presents simulation outcomes visually for easier interpretation. - Multiple Scenario Testing: Facilitates comparison between different simulation setups.