AI Analysis
The package aiguard-safety v0.7.5.9 has significant metadata risks due to low activity and missing maintainer information, raising suspicion of potential malicious intent.
- Low activity and lack of maintainer details in metadata.
- Potential signs of a supply-chain attack.
Per-check LLM notes
- Metadata: The low activity and lack of maintainer details raise concerns about potential malicious intent.
Package Quality Overall: Medium (5.2/10)
Partial test coverage signals detected
2 test file(s) detected (e.g. base_test.py)
Some documentation present
Detailed PyPI description (40609 chars)
No contributing guide or governance files found
Development Status classifier >= Beta
Partial type annotation coverage
215 type-annotated function signatures detected in source
Limited contributor diversity
2 unique contributor(s) across 92 commits in Shelton03/aiguardTwo distinct contributors found
Heuristic Checks
Found 3 network call pattern(s)
rer {api_key}" req = urllib.request.Request(endpoint, data=data, headers=headers, method="POST")try: with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=self._config.timeout_s) as resp:arer {api_key}" req = urllib.request.Request(endpoint, data=data, headers=headers, method="POST")
No obfuscation patterns detected
Found 3 shell execution pattern(s)
sβ¦") try: subprocess.run([npm_cmd, "install"], cwd=str(ui_dir), check=False)production bundleβ¦") subprocess.run([npm_cmd, "run", "build"], cwd=str(ui_dir), check=False).cmd" try: proc = subprocess.Popen( [npm_cmd, "run", "preview", "--", "--port", str
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
Email domain looks legitimate: gmail.com>
All external links appear legitimate
Git history flags: Repository has zero stars and zero forks
Repository has zero stars and zero forks
2 maintainer concern(s) found
Author name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Develop a comprehensive AI safety evaluation tool called 'SafetyGuard' using the Python package 'aiguard-safety'. This tool will serve as a user-friendly interface for evaluating the safety of any AI model based on adversarial attacks, evaluator performance, and hallucination detection. The application should generate detailed PDF reports summarizing the findings. Step 1: Setup the Project Environment - Install necessary libraries including 'aiguard-safety', 'pandas', 'matplotlib', and 'reportlab' for PDF generation. - Create a virtual environment and activate it. Step 2: Design the User Interface - Use a simple and intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) framework such as Tkinter or PyQt5. - Implement input fields for users to upload their AI models. - Include options for selecting the type of safety checks (adversarial, evaluator, hallucination). Step 3: Integrate 'aiguard-safety' - Utilize 'aiguard-safety' to perform adversarial attacks on the uploaded AI models. - Evaluate the robustness of the models against these attacks. - Detect potential hallucinations produced by the models under different scenarios. - Assess the evaluator's performance in accurately identifying safe versus unsafe outputs. Step 4: Generate Detailed Reports - Compile the results from each safety check into a structured format. - Use 'reportlab' to create professional-looking PDF reports that include charts, graphs, and textual summaries. - Ensure the reports are easy to understand and provide actionable insights. Suggested Features: - Real-time progress indicators during the safety evaluations. - Option to save and load previous model evaluations. - Comparative analysis feature allowing side-by-side comparisons of different models. - Customizable threshold settings for defining safe vs. unsafe behavior. - Integration with cloud storage services for backing up and sharing reports.