AI Analysis
The package has minimal direct risks such as network calls or shell execution, but its low-maintenance metadata suggests potential issues that warrant further investigation.
- Low metadata quality
- No package description provided
Per-check LLM notes
- Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires internet access for its functionality.
- Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no immediate risk of executing arbitrary commands.
- Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
- Metadata: The package shows signs of low maintenance and possibly low effort, raising some suspicion but not definitive evidence of malice.
Package Quality Overall: Low (3.6/10)
Test suite present — 12 test file(s) found
Test runner config found: conftest.pyTest runner config found: pyproject.toml12 test file(s) detected (e.g. conftest.py)
No documentation detected
No documentation URL, doc files, or meaningful description found
No contributing guide or governance files found
No CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, or governance files found
Partial type annotation coverage
152 type-annotated function signatures detected in source
Unable to verify contributor count: no GitHub repository found
No GitHub repository linked — contributor count unavailable
Heuristic Checks
No suspicious network call patterns found
No obfuscation patterns detected
No shell execution patterns detected
No credential harvesting patterns detected
No typosquatting candidates detected
No author email provided
All external links appear legitimate
No GitHub repository linked
No GitHub repository link found
4 maintainer concern(s) found
Only one version has ever been released — brand new packageAuthor name is missing or very shortAuthor "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)
No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.
AI App Starter Prompt
Create a comprehensive evaluation tool for assessing the performance of various Large Language Models (LLMs) using the 'agt-eval' Python package. This tool will allow users to input different prompts and evaluate how well each model responds based on predefined criteria such as accuracy, coherence, and relevance. The application should also provide a user-friendly interface for visualizing the results through graphs and charts. Additionally, incorporate a feature to compare multiple models simultaneously, showcasing their strengths and weaknesses side by side. Use 'agt-eval' to handle the evaluation process, ensuring that it integrates seamlessly with other Python libraries for data visualization like Matplotlib or Seaborn.