agentforge-testing

v0.2.4 suspicious
6.0
Medium Risk

Richer test helpers for AgentForge (golden-set runner, snapshot, recording analysis)

🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package shows low risks in terms of network usage, shell execution, obfuscation, and credential harvesting. However, the metadata risk score is elevated due to the suspicious maintainer history and untraceable git repository.

  • Suspicious maintainer history with only one package maintained
  • Untraceable git repository
Per-check LLM notes
  • Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires internet access to function properly.
  • Shell: No shell execution patterns detected, indicating no direct system command execution from the package.
  • Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
  • Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
  • Metadata: The package has a suspicious maintainer history with only one package and an untraceable git repository.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

Git Repository History score 3.0

Repository not found (deleted or private)

  • Repository not found (deleted or private)
Maintainer History score 2.0

1 maintainer concern(s) found

  • Author "The AgentForge Authors" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.

💡 AI App Starter Prompt

Use this prompt to build a project with agentforge-testing
Build a simple Python application using the agentforge-testing package to demonstrate its core features.