🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package shows no immediate signs of malicious activity but its metadata is concerning due to lack of maintainer history and essential information.

metadata risk due to lack of maintainer history and essential information
newly created package

Per-check LLM notes

Network: No network calls detected, which is normal unless the package requires external services.
Shell: No shell execution detected, indicating no direct system command execution risk.
Obfuscation: No obfuscation patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Credentials: No credential harvesting patterns detected, indicating low risk.
Metadata: The package is newly created with no maintainer history and lacks essential information like author details, raising suspicion.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

✓ Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

✓ Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

✓ Shell / Subprocess Execution

No shell execution patterns detected

✓ Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

✓ Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

✓ Registered Email Domain

No author email provided

✓ Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

✓ Git Repository History

No GitHub repository linked

No GitHub repository link found

⚠ Maintainer History score 10.0

5 maintainer concern(s) found

Only one version has ever been released — brand new package
Package uploaded less than 24 hours ago (2026-06-05T08:01:47.000Z)
Author name is missing or very short
Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Package has no PyPI classifiers (low effort / metadata quality)