RFL.log

v1.8.0 suspicious
5.0
Medium Risk

Rackslab Foundation Library: log package

🤖 AI Analysis

Final verdict: SUSPICIOUS

The package has a moderate risk score due to incomplete metadata and potential shell injection risks, although no direct evidence of malicious activity or network exposure was found.

  • Incomplete author information
  • Potential shell execution risk
Per-check LLM notes
  • Network: No network calls detected, which is normal for a logging package.
  • Shell: The shell execution pattern observed suggests the package might use a pager command for displaying logs, which could be intended for user convenience but should be reviewed to ensure it does not introduce security risks.
  • Metadata: The author information is incomplete, which raises some suspicion but does not strongly indicate malicious intent.

🔬 Heuristic Checks

Outbound Network Calls

No suspicious network call patterns found

Code Obfuscation

No obfuscation patterns detected

Shell / Subprocess Execution score 2.0

Found 1 shell execution pattern(s)

  • self._pager_process = subprocess.Popen( [pager_cmd], stdin=self._pipe_read,
Credential Harvesting

No credential harvesting patterns detected

Typosquatting

No typosquatting candidates detected

Registered Email Domain

Email domain looks legitimate: rackslab.io>

Suspicious Page Links

All external links appear legitimate

Git Repository History

Repository rackslab/RFL appears legitimate

Maintainer History score 4.0

2 maintainer concern(s) found

  • Author name is missing or very short
  • Author "" appears to have only 1 package on PyPI (new or inactive account)
Known CVE Vulnerabilities

No known vulnerabilities found in OSV database.

💡 AI App Starter Prompt

Use this prompt to build a project with RFL.log
Build a simple Python application using the RFL.log package to demonstrate its core features.